Hispanic men at a homeless shelter in Los Angeles
2446 "Not to enable the poor to share in our goods is
to steal from them and deprive them of life. The goods
we possess are not ours, but theirs. The demands of
justice must be satisfied first of all; that which is already
due in justice is not to be offered as a gift of charity."...
"when we attend to the needs of those in want, we give
them what is theirs, not ours. More than performing
works of mercy, we are paying a debt of justice"
Catechism of the Catholic Church
It never fails when I prove someone wrong in this never-ending slander against the poor, I am told that I am "entitled to my opinion," when I have actually demolished someone's lies with facts. It has become obvious to me that a great number of people do not know the difference between opinion and fact, so I start my post with a short tutorial:
The primary definition of "opinion," at least the one with which I am dealing here, is:
"A view or judgment formed about something,
not necessarily based on fact or knowledge."
"1. a thing that is indisputably the case; and,
2. a piece of information used as evidence or
as part of a report or news article"
The peculiar North American definition of "Welfare" is:
"financial support given to people in need."
Notice that "opinion" isn't necessarily based on the truth of a thing, while a "fact" IS. Therefore, if someone says:
"I am tired of illegals getting welfare,"
they are expressing an opinion (being "tired of it") based upon the supposed fact that "illegals get money from the government."
This opinion is based on a lie and is promoting that lie to other people, whether in social media, mass media or private conversations. I am going to make yet another stab at providing the factual information about undocumented immigrants in our country.
"Undocumented immigrants do not qualify
for welfare, food stamps, Medicaid, and most
other public benefits. Most of these programs
require proof of legal immigration status and,
under the 1996 welfare law, even legal immigrants
cannot receive these benefits until they have been
in the United States for more than 5 years."
CNN Money Article (1)
[Emphasis added.]
The above quote presents the factual circumstances of this issue, which facts are repeated by countless credible sources that can easily be found on the internet, yet scores of people have argued with me incessantly, vigorously and loudly, claiming that undocumented immigrants are given welfare as soon as they enter the country.
I suspect that something that confuses these people is the fact that, if a person is born in this country, they are American, which means that, if the illegal aliens have babies in our country, then those babies are Americans and they are entitled to a small amount of government assistance. These children are sometimes referred to as "anchor babies" that serve to allow the foreigners a tenuous foothold in this country. Even so, the amount of money given to these children is so small (about $550 each, plus food stamps), it is a marvel to me how much certain people begrudge the food that goes into the mouths of these little ones.
What I hear continually from angry Americans, is that they resent their taxes being spent on the poor because of this false impression that illegal aliens are raking in big bucks. They also accuse the disabled of faking their injuries, but that is another topic for another day. The angry Americans are widely under the mistaken impression that they are spending huge amounts of money on "welfare" for illegals and other poor people.
As of 2012, a person who earns $50,000 a year only pays $36.82 in taxes for food stamps and $6.96 in taxes for welfare per year. It seems like an awful lot of squawking for $43.78 PER YEAR IN TAXES EARMARKED FOR WELFARE AND FOOD STAMPS, especially when you compare that figure to the $4,000.00 a year they spend on corporate subsidies. Below is a tax breakdown using $50,000 per year income for one tax payer. These tax figures are provided by the White House and government agencies, collected by commondreams.org. (3)
I suspect that something that confuses these people is the fact that, if a person is born in this country, they are American, which means that, if the illegal aliens have babies in our country, then those babies are Americans and they are entitled to a small amount of government assistance. These children are sometimes referred to as "anchor babies" that serve to allow the foreigners a tenuous foothold in this country. Even so, the amount of money given to these children is so small (about $550 each, plus food stamps), it is a marvel to me how much certain people begrudge the food that goes into the mouths of these little ones.
What I hear continually from angry Americans, is that they resent their taxes being spent on the poor because of this false impression that illegal aliens are raking in big bucks. They also accuse the disabled of faking their injuries, but that is another topic for another day. The angry Americans are widely under the mistaken impression that they are spending huge amounts of money on "welfare" for illegals and other poor people.
As of 2012, a person who earns $50,000 a year only pays $36.82 in taxes for food stamps and $6.96 in taxes for welfare per year. It seems like an awful lot of squawking for $43.78 PER YEAR IN TAXES EARMARKED FOR WELFARE AND FOOD STAMPS, especially when you compare that figure to the $4,000.00 a year they spend on corporate subsidies. Below is a tax breakdown using $50,000 per year income for one tax payer. These tax figures are provided by the White House and government agencies, collected by commondreams.org. (3)
If we step back and look where all of the entitlement monies are spent after you have paid your taxes, the elderly, the disabled and the working poor account for the majority of it. Using the above model of the tax payer who earns $50,000 a year, his taxes for unemployment insurance, food stamps, welfare, retirement and disability to government workers and Medicare amount to $346.25, per year, added to which would be approximately $3,500 per year of Social Security taxes, making a grand total of $3846.25 paid into so-called "entitlement programs." These monies are spent out in the following percentages:
These figures were obtained from the U.S. Office of
Management and Budget, the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture,
the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the
US. Dept of Labor, and the U.S. Census Bureau.
According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities [February 2012] "more than 90 percent of the benefit dollars that entitlement and other mandatory programs spend go to assist people who are elderly, seriously disabled, or members of working households - not to able-bodied, working-age Americans who choose not to work. This figure has changed little in the past few years."
"Federal budget and census data show that, in 2010, 91 percent of the benefit dollars from entitlement and other mandatory programs went to the elderly (people 65 and over), the seriously disabled, and members of working households. People who are neither elderly nor disabled - and do not live in a working household - received only 9 percent of the benefits.
"Moreover, the vast bulk of that 9 percent goes for medical care, unemployment insurance benefits (which individuals must have a significant work history to receive), Social Security survivor benefits for the children and spouses of deceased workers, and Social Security benefits for retirees between ages 62 and 64. Seven out of the 9 percentage points go for one of these four purposes."
The remaining 2% include able-bodied people who "choose" not to work (many of whom are suffering from undiagnosed and/or untreated mental and emotional illnesses): hardly the vast conspiracy of fraud and corruption that uninformed and angry Americans claim are bankrupting our country.
In the past, I have heard the angry Americans discount facts by falsely labeling them "statistics," rather than raw data, and claiming that statistics can be skewed to suit the situation. While that perception of statistics could be true, I would point out that I am not providing "statistics," but raw data instead. The definition of statistics is:
"The practice or science of collecting and analyzing numerical
data in large quantities, especially for the purpose of inferring
proportions in a whole from those in a representative sample."
The definition of "raw data" is:
The information I have provided consists of raw figures provided by primary sources from which no inferences of proportions have been made. No manipulation of the data has been done. These are simply the facts of the law and the direct numerical (monetary) figures of the matters discussed.
I present these facts in an effort to curtail the cruel myths that are circulating throughout the internet and to begin to direct the attention of the angry Americans to the truth of this portion of the discussion about welfare in America.
Helpful sources:
"Raw data (also known as primary data) is a term for data
collected from a source. Raw data has not been subjected
to processing or any other manipulation."
I present these facts in an effort to curtail the cruel myths that are circulating throughout the internet and to begin to direct the attention of the angry Americans to the truth of this portion of the discussion about welfare in America.
Helpful sources:
(2) LIFE BEFORE SOCIAL SECURITY
(3) COMMON DREAMS
(4) CENTER ON BUDGET AND POLICY PRIORITIES
God bless us all,
Silver "Rose" Parnell
(c) 2015
(3) COMMON DREAMS
(4) CENTER ON BUDGET AND POLICY PRIORITIES
God bless us all,
Silver "Rose" Parnell
(c) 2015
No comments:
Post a Comment